Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
2.
Eur J Public Health ; 33(2): 202-208, 2023 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2243836

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many studies report that foreign-born healthcare workers (HCWs) in high-income countries have an elevated risk of COVID-19. However, research has not yet specifically evaluated the distribution of COVID-19 among foreign-born workers in different healthcare work groups. We examined the risk of COVID-19 infection and hospitalization among foreign-born HCWs in different occupational roles in Sweden. METHODS: We linked occupational data (2019) of 783 950 employed foreign-born workers (20-65 years) to COVID-19 data registered between 1 January 2020 and 30 September 2021. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of COVID-19 infection and hospitalization in eight healthcare occupational groups vs. non-HCWs and assessed whether region of birth modified the association between healthcare occupations and COVID-19. RESULTS: All HCWs had a higher risk of COVID-19 outcomes than non-HCWs, but the risk differed by occupational role. Hospital-based assistant nurses had the highest risk (infection: HR 1.78; 95% CI 1.72-1.85; hospitalization: HR 1.79; 95% CI 1.52-2.11); allied HCWs had the lowest risk (infection: HR 1.22; 95% CI 1.10-1.35; hospitalization: HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.59-1.63). The relative hazard of the outcomes varied across foreign-born workers from different regions. For example, the relative risk of COVID-19 infection associated with being a physician compared to a non-HCW was 31% higher for African-born than European-born workers. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of COVID-19 among foreign-born HCWs differed by occupational role and immigrant background. Public health efforts that target occupational exposures as well as incorporate culturally responsive measures may help reduce COVID-19 risk among foreign-born HCWs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Sweden/epidemiology , Risk , Health Personnel , Proportional Hazards Models
3.
Int J Infect Dis ; 2022 Nov 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2239458

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive characterisation of patients diagnosed with post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) during the first 16 months of usage of the International Classification of Diseases revision 10 (ICD-10) diagnosis code U09.9 in Sweden. METHODS: We used data from national registers and primary healthcare databases for all adult inhabitants of the two largest regions in Sweden, comprising 4.1 million inhabitants (approximately 40% of the Swedish population). We present the cumulative incidence and incidence rate of PCC overall and among subgroups and describe COVID-19 patients with or without PCC regarding sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, subsequent diseases, COVID-19 severity, and virus variants. FINDINGS: Of all registered COVID-19 cases available for PCC diagnosis (n=506,107), 2.0% (n=10,196) had been diagnosed with PCC using ICD-10 code U09.9 as of 15 February 2022 in the two largest regions in Sweden. The cumulative incidence was higher among women compared to men (2.3% vs 1.6%, p<0.001). The majority of PCC cases (n=7,162, 70.2%) had not been hospitalised for COVID-19. This group was more commonly female (69.9% vs 52.9%, p<0.001), had a tertiary education (51.0% vs 44.1%, p<0.001), and was older (median age difference 5.7 years, p<0.001) compared to non-hospitalised COVID-19 patients without PCC. INTERPRETATION: This characterisation furthers the understanding of patients diagnosed with PCC and could support policymakers with appropriate societal and healthcare resource allocation.

4.
J Intern Med ; 2022 Nov 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2229223

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several studies have investigated associations between ABO blood group and risk of COVID-19, with inconsistent results. OBJECTIVE: To study associations between ABO blood group and risk of different stages of COVID-19. METHODS: The study was based on nationwide registers encompassing all blood-grouped persons in Sweden, and all of their COVID-19-related outcomes. Associations between ABO blood group and COVID-19 outcomes were estimated using Poisson regression models. Analyses were conducted overall and stratified by vaccination status. RESULTS: A total of 4,986,878 individuals were included. The incidence rate ratios of testing positive for COVID-19 were 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.08), 1.06 (95% CI, 1.05-1.07), and 1.01 (95% CI, 1.00-1.01) for blood groups A, AB, and B, respectively, as compared to O. Similar associations were seen for risk of hospital admissions, intensive care unit admissions, and risk of death. For most outcomes, associations with ABO blood group were much attenuated or even reversed in vaccinated individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with blood groups A, AB, and B are at increased risk of contracting COVID-19 as well as developing more severe forms of the disease.

5.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(12)2022 Dec 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2143811

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We estimated real-world vaccine effectiveness (VE) against COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, ICU admission, and death up to 13 months after vaccination. VE before and after the emergence of Omicron was investigated. METHODS: We used registered data from the entire Swedish population above age 12 (n = 9,153,456). Cox regression with time-varying exposure was used to estimate weekly/monthly VE against COVID-19 outcomes from 27 December 2020 to 31 January 2022. The analyses were stratified by age, sex, and vaccine type (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, and AZD1222). RESULTS: Two vaccine doses offered good long-lasting protection against infection before Omicron (VE were above 85% for all time intervals) but limited protection against Omicron infection (dropped to 43% by week four and no protection by week 14). For severe COVID-19 outcomes, higher VE was observed during the entire follow-up period. Among individuals above age 65, the mRNA vaccines showed better VE against infection than AZD1222 but similar high VE against hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide strong evidence for long-term maintained protection against severe COVID-19 by the basic two-dose schedule, supporting more efforts to encourage unvaccinated persons to get the basic two doses, and encourage vaccinated persons to get a booster to ensure better population-level protection.

7.
Lancet Reg Health Eur ; 15: 100331, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1700814

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A broad vaccination coverage is crucial for preventing the spread of Covid-19 and reduce serious illness or death. The aim of this study was to examine social inequalities in Covid-19 vaccination uptake as of 17th May 2021 among Swedish adults aged ≥ 60 years. METHODS: The study population comprised a general population cohort aged 60 years or older (n = 350,805), representative of the Swedish population. Data were collected through the nationwide linked multi-register observational study SCIFI-PEARL, and associations between sociodemographic determinants and Covid-19 vaccination uptake were analysed using logistic regression. Intersectional analyses of sociodemographic heterogeneity were performed by taking several overlapping social dimensions into account. Data availability extended to 17 May 2021. FINDINGS: The overall vaccination coverage was 87·2% by 17th May 2021. Younger age, male sex, lower income, living alone, and being born outside Sweden, were all associated with a lower uptake of vaccination. The lowest Covid-19 vaccination uptake was seen in individuals born in low-or middle-income countries, of which only 60% had received vaccination, with an odds ratio (OR) of not being vaccinated of 6·05 (95% CI: 5·85-6·26) compared to individuals born in Sweden. These associations persisted after adjustments for possible confounding factors. The intersectional analyses showed even larger variations in vaccination in cross-classified sociodemographic subgroups (ranging from 44% to 97%) with marked differences in uptake of vaccination within sociodemographic groups. INTERPRETATION: The uptake of Covid-19 vaccine during the spring of 2021 in Sweden varied substantially both between and within sociodemographic groups. The use of an intersectional approach, taking several overlapping social dimensions into account at the same time rather than only using one-dimensional measures, contributes to a better understanding of the complexity in the uptake of vaccination. FUNDING: SciLifeLab / Knut & Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Swedish Research Council, Swedish government ALF-agreement, FORMAS.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL